assets/media/2024/yahaya-bello-and-efcc.jpg Galaxy Television | Court fixes April 23 for ruling on substituted service of charge on Yahaya Bello
Galaxy Television Menu

Court fixes April 23 for ruling on substituted service of charge on Yahaya Bello

Court fixes April 23 for ruling on substituted service of charge on Yahaya Bello

A Federal High Court, Abuja, on Thursday fixed April 23 for ruling in the application by Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), seeking a substituted service of the charge on the immediate-past Governor of Kogi State, Alhaji Yahaya Bello. Justice Emeka Nwite fixed the date after counsel for the EFCC, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, and the ex-governor's lawyer, Abdulwahab Mohammed, SAN, presented their arguments for and against the oral application.

Galaxy Tv reports that When the matter was called for the arraignment of Bello on a 19-count money laundering charge preferred against him, the former governor was not in court. However, his team of lawyers, including Adeola Adedipe, SAN, was in court. Mohammed, who announced appearance for Bello, challenged the validity of the charge on the ground that the the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the matter on the one hand and to have issued the arrest warrant against his client on the other hand.

He informed the court that a preliminary objection had already been filed before the court to the effect. The lawyer, who urged the court to vacate the arrest warrant order, said a High Court of Kogi had on February. 9 restrained the anti-graft agency from arresting, detaining or prosecuting Bello. He said the ruling was on a fundamental rights suit filed by the former governor and that the EFCC was a party in the matter.

He added that two of the senior advocates representing the anti-graft agency in the instant charge were also in the matter. Mohammed said the order was challenged by the EFCC at the Court of Appeal and the matter was already fixed for hearing. He stressed that the arrest warrant the commission surreptitiously got from the court was an attempt to bring the court on collision course with the Appeal Court.

Bello's lawyer, who insisted that the issue of jurisdiction was a threshold which the court must address first, argued that the charge ought not to have been filed in view of the appeal. However, EFCC's lawyer disagreed with Mohammed's submission.

Pinheiro said the matter was fixed for Bello's arraignment and Mohammed, having announced appearance for the ex-governor, could be served in the open court for the matter to proceed. The court adjourned to May 23 for ruling on substituted service.

The Prosecution Counsel, Kemi Pinhiero, spoke on the proceeding saying the commission would use everything within it's power to arraign the former Governor at the next adjourned date.

Related Articles


The following 6 pages may interest you as well: